Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Arguing In An Argumentative Essay About College Athletes And Pay

Arguing In An Argumentative Essay About College Athletes And PayAn argumentative essay about paying college athletes for their contributions to our nation's athletic teams is something of a strange beast. When you take into account the actual text of the essay, what you have is a highly relevant and important piece of student-written literature. But the essay as writing goes from one end of the spectrum to the other, with any honest assessment of its true value sitting somewhere in the middle.A debate on the issue of whether the NCAA should pay high school football players to play or not is not the same as a logical argumentative essay about college sports and the free market. It is simply not possible to engage in a debate on the topic of whether college athletes should be paid to play unless you can actually define the terms that you are debating. So how should one go about this?For starters, there is one thing you need to remember when it comes to writing an argumentative essay. Y ou cannot argue with the premise. If you want to write an argumentative essay about the issue of college sports and pay, you can't go around arguing against it as though you were debating its validity.Even if you were to figure out how to argue for it in the course of your essay, you are going to have to give the same amount of justification for why college athletes should be paid as you would for any other aspect of the collegiate athletic industry. Otherwise, you are going to be accused of just making up facts for the sake of your argument. That is not how you win an argument. In fact, it is the opposite.The root problem with arguments like those presented in the argumentative essay on paying college athletes is that they involve hypotheticals. This means that you have to examine scenarios which are not based on reality. It is easy to tell why this is the case: if you had to describe a hypothetical scenario that you could support with hard evidence or empirical research, you would not have to demonstrate why the scenario would actually happen. You would have to demonstrate why it would not happen.To make an argumentative essay about college athletes and pay, you are simply telling a hypothetical that you know is not true. But that does not mean that you cannot discuss what would happen if it did happen. You are simply not allowed to use hard evidence or facts to do so. Using case studies, hypothetical scenarios, or other techniques to justify your point of view are not permitted.If you are not convinced by the substance of your argumentative essay about college athletes and pay, there is no reason to worry. You will not be fired from your job or blackballed by the college admissions officers at the colleges you attend. You should worry if your employer fires you because of your writing of a provocative and well-argued argument. College athletes make enough money already, and having someone suggest that it is worth them more would be a disservice to the vast majority of college athletes who have dedicated themselves to this field full-time.If you are still interested in writing an argumentative essay about college athletes and pay, you should read other works on the subject. Or better yet, if you can find a very good one, you should read it again, thinking of ways to improve it. It is always good to get out of the intellectual prison in which you found yourself in and step outside of the box that you are placed in because of the way you want to use the piece of literature you have produced.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.